HERAWATI DEVI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/37302/2025 · 2025-10-29
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171882 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171882 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37302 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel representing the respondent Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No. 2, the Additional District Magistrate (Finance/Revenue), Jaunpur, to decide the Restoration Application No. 691 of 2025 [Heerawati Devi Vs. Jwala], in Case No. 4466 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. D202414360004466) [Jwala and Others Vs. Hubraj and Others], under Section 30 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. The order sheet of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition indicates that after filing of the restoration application, although several dates have been fixed, but the matter is being adjourned for some reason or the other. It is submitted that the delay in disposal of the aforesaid restoration application and the proceedings of the case, is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioners, by way of the present petition, has sought the proceedings of the restoration application as well as the case to be concluded expeditiously. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Respondent(s) and the counsel appearing for the respondent Gram Sabha, have no objection if the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Herawati Devi And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
proceedings are expedited. Having regard to the aforementioned facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court concerned would make an endeavor to decide the restoration application and also the case itself, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the instant order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment.
October 30, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 37302 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad