Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171881 (ALL)

ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/36713/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36713 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Heard Sri Jayendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner wants a direction to the respondent district administration to get the Gaon Sabha land vacated from illegal encroachment. 3. In our considered view, petitioner has adequate and efficacious alternative remedy to move an appropriate application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, hence, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. 4. However, we still provide, in the event petitioner moves any such application upon the format prescribed for entertaining complaint petition under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered by the concerned authority and shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law and as per the procedure prescribed for under relevant Act and Rules and that too within the stipulated period of time prescribed under the said Act. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 #Vikram/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jayendra Kumar Mishra, Keerti Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad