Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17187 (GAU)

ATUL BASUMATARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/5088/2020 · 2025-06-15

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010173202020 2025:GAU-AS:7930 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5088/2020 ATUL BASUMATARY S/O- SRI NAGENDRA BASUMATARY, R/O- VILL- NO. 1 SANTIPUR, P.O. UDALGURI, P.S. UDALGURI, DIST.- UDALGURI, BTR, ASSAM, PIN- 784509 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME NEW DELHI 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM GUWAHATI 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT DISTRICT 5:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE JORHAT P.S. JORHAT 6:THE IN-CHARGE LICHUBARI POLICE OUT POST JORHAT 7:THE DY. COMMISSIONER JORHAT DISTRICT Page No.# 2/3 JORHA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY, MR. P K DAS,MR. D BORA,MR. N MAHAJAN Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 16.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. N Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner with a prayer to issue a direction for proper investigation of the FIR registered as Jorhat PS Case No.1858/2020 under sections 302/392 IPC, by an independent agency like CBI, CID etc and to be monitored by this court. 3. Though no affidavit has been filed, however, the learned Government Advocate has submitted a report that after completion of investigation, charge sheet vide Jorhat PS CS No.10/2021 dated 27.01.202, has been filed. 4. It is further submitted by the learned Government Advocate that charges were framed on 30.08.2022 and the prosecution has also started examining their witnesses from 15.12.2022 and matter is now fixed on 17.07.2025 for further examination of prosecution witnesses. 5. In view of the aforesaid, and in absence of any material to suggest any exceptional circumstances to issue a direction for an Page No.# 3/3 independent investigation, this court is of the view that at this stage, this court may not exercise its power of judicial review to direct an independent investigation. However, it is needless to say that the petitioner being informant shall have all right to participate in the trial, if so desires. 6. This court shall also expect that trial be expeditiously completed. 7. In the aforesaid terms, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant