ANKUR BAGARIYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U. P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/25448/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25448 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing charge sheet dated 19.7.2018 and summoning order dated 13.8.2019 as well as entire proceeding of Case no. 2531/2019 (State vs. Ankur Bagariya) arising out of Case Crime no. 246 of 2018 under sections 419, 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC, PS- Kotwali Padrauna, District Kushinagar.
3. On perusal of the entire material available on record in shape of impugned order along with other record, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, if there is no other legal impediment before learned court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurav Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankur Bagariya And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U. P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
concerned, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants namely Ankur Bagariya and Pradeep Bagariya in pursuance of aforesaid case. October 28, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 25448 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad