HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 9736 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Shailendra, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Arvind Kumar Goswami, learned counsel for Respondent-1 and Sri Jagdish Pathak, Advocate for Respondent-5. 2. Petitioner has failed to explain the delay even by filing supplementary affidavit. For reference para 4 of supplementary affidavit is reproduced hereinafter: “4. That, by means of present supplementary affidavit, the deponent is placing on record the medical report/ doctor’s prescriptions relating to petitioner’s illness, which is being enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure SA-1 to this supplementary affidavit.” 3. Since delay in filing writ petition is not satisfactorily explained, therefore, there is no reason to consider this writ petition. 4. Dismissed accordingly. October 30, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitesh Kumar, Shailendra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Jagdish Pathak (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Rajeev Sanjay Calton .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad