in C.S.No.200 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A NO. 1750 of 2024 in CS NO. 200 OF 2020 S.Sumathy .. Applicant Vs. 1.S.Annamalai 2.Pushpa 3.Daisy Rani 4.Deepika 5.Lokesh .. Respondents PRAYER : This application is filed under Order XVI Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC.to permit the applicant /plaintiff in Judges summons verification para in A.No.1808 of 2023 as Sumathy instead of Krishnan. For Applicant : M/s.C.Rajan For R1 & R2 : M/s.B.A.Prakash ORDER p. 2 in C.S.No.200 of 2020 This application has been filed by the applicant / plaintiff to amend the name of the applicant in Judge's summon in A.No.1808 of 2023 which was wrongly mentioned as "Krishnan" instead of "Sumathy". P. DHANABAL, J. kkd 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit and has filed an application in I.A.No.1808 of 2023 to alienate and deal with the two flats and also give necessary authority or power in favour of the promoter or any person nominated by him being the 50% of the UDS share and also the constructed flat. In the application, the name of the applicant/plaintiff has been wrongly mentioned in the Judges summon as "Krishnan" instead of "Sumathy" in page No.3 of the Judge's summons and therefore the typographical error is to be corrected. 3. The other side have not filed any counter affidavit in this application. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and the fact that the p. 3 in C.S.No.200 of 2020 name of the applicant has been wrongly mentioned as "Krishnan" instead of "Sumathy", the said typographical error requires correction and accordingly, this application is allowed. 08.12.2025 kkd A NO. 1750 of 202 4 IN CS NO. 2 00 OF 202 0 (3/5)