Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171842 (ALL)

PRAMOD CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/36713/2025 · 2025-10-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36713 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State- respondent and perused the record. 2. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Pramod Chauhan seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.522 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Ghosi, District- Mau. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused-applicant has not prepared any forged document in this case. He has been falsely implicated due to ulterior motive. He is not beneficiary of the so called activity and transaction and is languishing in jail since 24.09.2025. It is submitted that applicant has one criminal history to his credit which has been explained in paragraph no. 29 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is argued that charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, there is no reasonable possibility of intimidating or pressurizing the prosecution witnesses. It is further argued that the accused applicant has no criminal history and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. 4. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the accused applicant has committed the alleged offence. It is admitted fact that the said document has been prepared by the applicant. He further submitted that chargesheet has already been submitted agaisnt the applicant in this case. 5. Considering the fact that the accused applicant is in jail since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunita Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 24.09.2025; the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. Let the accused-applicant, Pramod Chauhan involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 8. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. October 27, 2025 Gss BAIL No. 36713 of 2025 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad