Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17184 (AP)

THE MANAGING COMMITTEE v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11673/2025 · 2025-06-18

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11673 OF 2025 Between: The Managing Committee, Jamiya Masjid, Jaggaiahpet Town and Mandal, Rep. by its President Janab Shaik Jaleel, S/o. Saida Saheb, aged about 53 years, R/o. Near Jamiya Masjid Main Road, Jaggaiahpet Town and Mandal, N T R District, A.P. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Minority Welfare Department, A.P. Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, 4*^^ and 5^^ floor imdad Ghar, 0pp. K.R. Market, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. 3. The Inspector Auditor Waqfs, N T R District Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, ...Respondents petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the may nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly the 3 Respondent/Inspector Auditor Waqfs, NTR District for not handing over the complete charge of the notified institution namely Jamiya Masjid and its attached properties situated at Jaggaiahpet Town and Mandal in spite a specific direction given by the 2"'^ Respondent vide proceedings in F.No.64/C/KST/2016/Supple dated 16.04.2025 i being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, in violation of provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 and regulations made there under and more IS consequentially direct the S'"* Respondent to hand over the complete charge of the notified institution namely Jamiya Masjid and its attached properties situated Jaggaiahpet Town and Mandal to the petitioner/managing at committee forthwith. lA MO! 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to hand over the complete charge of the notified institution namely Jamiya Masjid and its attached situated at Jaggaiahpet Town & Mandal committee forthwith. may be properties to the petitioner/managing Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MASALEGAR |;Counsel for the Respondent No.1: HIDAYATHULLA GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE rounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: IPR WQKF BOARD SRI SHAIK KHAJA BASHA, SC e Court made the following: APHC010233252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11673/2025 Between: The Managing Committee ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MASALEGAR HIDAYATHULLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2.SHA1KKHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: ) :: ORDER :: i The above writ petition has been filed to declare the inaction of respondent No.3 for not handing over the complete charge of the notified institution namely Jamiya Masjid and its attached properties situated at jaggaiahpet Town and Mandal despite a direction by respondent No.2 vide proceedings in F.No.64/C/KST/2016/Supple dated 16.04.2025, as illegal and arbitrary. Page 2 of 3 2. Heard Sri Subhan, learned counsel representing Sri M. Hidayathulla counsel for respondents 2 and 3. ^ . &• 'B 3. Learned standing counsel for pending the writ petition respondents 2 and 3 submitted respondent No.2, CEO, issued that proceedings vide F.NO.64/C/KST/2016/Supple dated 30.04.2025, keeping the proceedings issued vide F.No. 64/C/KST/2016/Supple dated 16.04.2025, whereby a con.n„ttee was constituted, in abeyance, until further orders. 4. Learned counsel for the dated 30.04.2025 petitioner would submit that the were issued without a prior resolution of the board. proceedings 5. Since the CEO of respondent No.2 issued proceedings dated of the committee in abeyance, the survive for adjudication. 30.04.2025, keeping the constitution cause in the writ petition does not 6. Hence, this writ petition is closed, gi challenge the proceedings dated available to the petitioner. No costs. giving liberty to the petitioner to 30.04.2025 by raising all the grounds As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU assistant registrar //TRUE CO To, SECTION OFFICER HIDAYATHULLA, Advocate [OPUCJ khaja basha, standing 1. One CC to SRI. MASALEGAR 2. One CC to SRI. SHAIK COUNSEL FOR WQKF BOARD [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for social welfare. High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED: 19/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.11673 of 2025 CLOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS