HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15793 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that though he was working on the post of Chief Assistant and he was superannuated on 31.05.2023, but the writ petitioner has not been accorded benefit of revision of pay-fixation and there are certain arrears and petitioner is entitled to the payment of pension on the last pay drawn, i.e. Rs.56900/- though he is being paid Rs.53600/-. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be decided by Respondent no.3, District Magistrate, at the first instance. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3 by 07.11.2025, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikram Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Vasudev .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad