HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35849 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Heard Sri Indra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7239 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 127 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Aliganj, District Etah as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 25.03.2025, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 18, Etah. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Beerendra Pratap Singh, Indra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dr Amarnath And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. October 29, 2025 MAA/- NA528 No. 35849 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad