- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1519 WP No. 38325 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 38325 OF 2017 (GM-PP) BETWEEN: SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE HUCCHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT DODDABAGANAHALLI, AGILE POST, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN-573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NEERAJA KARANTH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHRIHARI.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAKSHMI D/O LATE DYAVAYYA, AGED 47 YEARS, BEHIND CHANNAVERAPPA FRUIT STALL, WARD NO.30, HASSAN-573 201. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573 201. 3. THE COMPETENT OFFICER, CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, B.M.ROAD, HASSAN-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRIKARA.P.K., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. A.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1519 WP No. 38325 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Neeraja Karanth., counsel on behalf of Sri.Shrihari.K., for the petitioner and Sri.Shrikara.P.K., counsel for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. Sri.A.Ravishankar., counsel for respondent No.2 has appeared through video conferencing. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 03.09.2015 passed by the Prl. District Judge, Hassan in M.A.No.02/2015 vide Annexure-A. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.Shrikara.P.K., submits that the order dated 03.09.2015 passed in M.A.No.02/2015 is quashed by this Court on 07.03.2019 in W.P.No.2010/2016. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1519 WP No. 38325 of 2017 Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the said submission and submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. 5. Because the impugned order dated 03.09.2015 in M.A.No.02/2015 is already quashed by the Coordinate bench of this Court in W.P.No.2010/2016, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 34