Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171804 (ALL)

BRAHMANAND PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRPIL/2/2023 · 2025-10-26

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL WRIT-PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. - 2 of 2023 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard the petitioner in person and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In this criminal writ petition (PIL) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following prayers :- "1) उपिजला मिजस्ट्रेट आदेश िदनांक 06.10.2022 अपास्थ हो। 2) राज्य द्वारा आबादी घोिषत में अंितम मानव जीवन हेतु पैदल, दो वाहन और आकिस्मक एंबुलेंस हेतु मागर् उपलब्ध हेतु आदेश पािरत हो। 3) अम्बेडकर िवद्यालय से ग्रामसभा, अन्य जन के भूिम पर िनिमत उत्तरवादी नं० 3 दरवाजे तक हाल सड़क िनमार्ण अवैध घोिषत हो। अथवा उत्तरवादी नं० 03 दरवाजे से न्यूसेंस हटाने पुनः मुख्य मागर् को आबादी मागर् से युक्त हेतु आदेश पािरत हो। 4) उपिजला मिजस्ट्रेट, न्याियक तहसीलदार िवरूद्ध िविधक कायर्वाही हेतु आदेश पािरत हो। 5) न्याय व िविध दृिष्टकोण से जो उिचत हो आदेश पािरत हो।" 3. In effect, the prayer of the petitioner is to quash the order dated 06.10.2022 which has been passed under Section 133 of CrPC by the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Sagadi, Azamgarh. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the Public Interest Litigation and submitted that before the petitioner approached this Court, he should have availed the remedy of revision which is very much available under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Brahmanand Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. We, therefore, without going into the merits of the case, direct that if the petitioner files a Revision within the next 15 days, then the revision of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law within the next two months without going into the question of limitation. 6. We have condoned the delay as we find that the petitioner had been contesting the matter in the High Court diligently. 7. With these observations, the Public Interest Litigation, as of now, stands disposed of. October 27, 2025 Rama Kant CRPIL No. 2 of 2023 2 (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad