- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5053 WP No. 4674 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4674 OF 2020 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: M/S. SJM INFOTECH PVT LTD., NO. 198 AND 199, MATHRUSHRI COMPLEX, ULLALA MAIN ROAD, ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT, JNANABHARATHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 056. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS, MR. T.K.MANJUNATH AND MRS. PAVITHRA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.M.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: ANDHRA BANK ULLAL MAIN ROAD BRANCH, 199 AND 198, ULLAL MAIN ROAD, 6TH MAIN ROAD, ANNAPURNESHWARI LAYOUT, JNANABHARATHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 056. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SATISH.B.H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.P.MUTHANNA., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5053 WP No. 4674 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's pending for almost five years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11