Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171753 (ALL)

NARENDRA KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/24637/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24637 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. In compliance of the order dated 29.7.2025, learned Standing Counsel placed instructions dated 7.8.2025 under the signature of respondent no. 3 and the same is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Gauri Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents for construction of Nali on the east side or the Road (which has been demolished during road widening) so that the drain water of the village of the petitioner may be evacuated. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 for taking decision upon the application sent by the petitioner on 13.6.2025 (contained in Annexure no. 8 to the writ petition)." 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that a detailed representation has been submitted by the petitioner before respondent no. 3 i.e. Executive Engineer Public Works Department Jaunpur which is still pending. 5. On the other hand it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case the petitioner will submit a fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the respondent no. 3, he will take the decision expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties and without entering Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gauri Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Narendra Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no. 3 along-with certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. If such a representation is filed, the respondent No. 3 will pass appropriate orders on the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. October 28, 2025 Sushma WRIC No. 24637 of 2025 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad