NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR v. SUBHASH CHANDRA AGGARWAL
W.P.(C)/6089/2019 · 2025-01-15
Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17174 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17174 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 6089/2019 & W.P.(C) 6377/2019
$~21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6089/2019
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, ASC with Mr. Soumitra Chatterjee and Mr. Manish, Advs.
versus
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv.
+ W.P.(C) 6377/2019
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ...Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, ASC with Mr. Soumitra Chatterjee and Mr. Manish, Advs.
versus
DR. G.S THIND
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL) %
15.01.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Padma Kumar S, learned Counsel for the respondent, submits that these writ petitions are directed against interim orders Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.01.2025 15:28:18 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 6089/2019 & W.P.(C) 6377/2019
passed by the Tribunal in OAs which have since been withdrawn by his clients.
2. As such, he submits that these writ petitions do not survive for
consideration.
3. Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the petitioners, confirms this position.
4. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
JANUARY 15, 2025
dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.01.2025 15:28:18