Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17174 (DEL)

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR v. SUBHASH CHANDRA AGGARWAL

W.P.(C)/6089/2019 · 2025-01-15

Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 6089/2019 & W.P.(C) 6377/2019 $~21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6089/2019 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, ASC with Mr. Soumitra Chatterjee and Mr. Manish, Advs. versus SUBHASH CHANDRA AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. + W.P.(C) 6377/2019 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ...Petitioners Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, ASC with Mr. Soumitra Chatterjee and Mr. Manish, Advs. versus DR. G.S THIND .....Respondent Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 15.01.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Mr. Padma Kumar S, learned Counsel for the respondent, submits that these writ petitions are directed against interim orders Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.01.2025 15:28:18 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 6089/2019 & W.P.(C) 6377/2019 passed by the Tribunal in OAs which have since been withdrawn by his clients. 2. As such, he submits that these writ petitions do not survive for consideration. 3. Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the petitioners, confirms this position. 4. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. JANUARY 15, 2025 dsn Click here to check corrigendum, if any Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:24.01.2025 15:28:18