Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171733 (ALL)

DEEPAK YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/9816/2025 · 2025-10-29

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9816 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred to set aside the charge sheet dated 29.06.2025 as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 10.09.2025 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Mau in Session Case No.955 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No.177 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2) of BNS and Section 3(1) (da) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Muhamadabad Gohna, District Mau. 3. After the matter has been heard at some length, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that he does not want to press the prayer made in the appeal. His sole prayer is that a direction may be issued to the court below to decide the bail application of the appellants in accordance with law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present appeal is disposed of with the direction that in case the appellants filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law. 5. With the above observations, this appeal is disposed of finally. October 30, 2025 Ajeet Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Deepak Yadav And Another .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad