Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17172 (RAJ)

ARBAJ S/O SARFU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5633/2025 · 2025-07-11

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25739] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5598/2025 Ajruddin @ Arju S/o Abdul Majeed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Fatehpur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5599/2025 Yusuf S/o Habbi, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Neemkheda, Police Station Punhana, District Nooh, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5633/2025 Arbaj S/o Sarfu, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Fatehpur, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 11/07/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:25739] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5598/2025] 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.78/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence punishable under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) & 61(2)(b) and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. They also submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 are allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioners namely 1. Ajruddin @ Arju S/o Abdul Majeed 2. Yusuf S/o Habbi 3. Arbaj S/o Sarfu shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of [2025:RJ-JP:25739] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5598/2025] Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /137-139