HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6669 of 2025 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. This criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist- Jugendra Singh against the impugned judgment and order dated 2.9.2025 passed by learned court below in Session Case No.534 of 2021 (State vs. Raghvendra alias Manoj and others) arising out of Case Crime No.468 of 2020 under Sections 498- A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Etah, whereby the learned trial court has rejected the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. filed by the revisionist. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that his application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been rejected vide impugned order dated 2.9.2025. 4. As per the allegations of the FIR, the general allegations against the family-members and in-laws that they have killed the deceased by way of throttling. They are general allegations against all the family members. 5. After investigation, the charge-sheet has been filed only Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Santosh Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jugendra Singh .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) against the husband of the deceased. As per postmortem report, the cause of death is 'asphyxia' as a result of antemortem hanging. There are no external injury on the parts of the deceased. There was no cause of death as throttling. 6. In view thereof, I find, there was no cause of death due to throttling and the impugned order does not possess any irregularity or illegality. The criminal revision is liable to be dismissed. 7. It is dismissed, accordingly. October 29, 2025 LN Tripathi CRLR No. 6669 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad