[2025:RJ-JP:31765] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5670/2025 Bikesh @ B.k. S/o Kumhersingh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Atarsuma, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.205/2024 registered at Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 307 & 506 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307 & 506 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that FIR in this matter has been registered on the basis of the Parcha Bayan of the injured wherein name of the petitioner is not appearing. Counsel submits that later on, after eight days of the alleged incident, injured was examined under Section 161 Cr.PC wherein petitioner has been named. Counsel submits that in FIR, allegation [2025:RJ-JP:31765] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5670/2025] of causing injury is against the co-accused Ramhari. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as two other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the material made available on record in the form of charge-sheet; petitioner is not named in the Parcha Bayan of the injured; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Bikesh @ B.k. S/o Kumhersingh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:31765] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5670/2025] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /62