Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17168 (CHH)

NEELMANI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1287/2025 · 2025-04-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17160 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1287 of 2025 Neelmani Yadav S/o Angadram Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Bhelwatoli, Ps And Tahsil- Lailunga,, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station- Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 15.04. 2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. This is an ofÏce reference. 3. This Court, vide order dated 22.03.2024, passed in MCRC No. 181 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Neelmani Yadav, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of passing of the order, if there was no legal impediment. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 4. Earlier on one occasion also this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 22.03.2024. 5. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Raigarh, District- Raigarh , (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 26.03.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 6. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in this case, statements of 04 prosecution witnesses have been recorded and the statements of 05 prosecution witnesses are yet to be recorded and the time prescribed by this Court is going to be expired, therefore he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the same. 7. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 8. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 9. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal