HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15950 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Pathak, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The sole prayer of the writ petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the writ petitioner, whereby the claim has been made for grant of salary and medical leave for the period for which the petitioner claims to be entitled. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the representation of the writ petitioner is to be considered/ decided by Respondent no.3/ District Panchayat Raj Adhikari, District- Jaunpur at the first instance. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3 by 07.11.2025, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider and decide the representation of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar, Sanjay Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Mumtaz Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad