Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010173652025 2025:GAU-AS:10285 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1881/2025 MOYAJ UDDIN ALIAS MOHAMMAD MAIJUDDIN ALIAS MD MAIJUDDIN S/O HAIDAR ALI R/O VILL ALENGMARI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : TUN RAJKHOWA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 06.08.2025 1. Heard Ms. T. Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Moyaj Uddin @ Mohammad Page No.# 2/3 Maijuddin @ Md. Maijuddin, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with PRC Case No.34/2024 under Sections 448/363/34 IPC arising out of Bijni P.S Case No.131/2023, pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bijni, district - Chirang. 3. A complaint was lodged by Asmat Ali, which was sent for police investigation resulting in registration of the aforesaid case and investigation returned a charge-sheet against all the three accused persons including the petitioner. However, the present petitioner was shown as an absconder and learned Court below i.e. SDJM, Bijni issued an NBWA vide order dated 05.07.2025, fixing next date on 13.08.2025. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the other two accused persons are already enlarged on bail and that the present petitioner was working in Gujarat and therefore, could not appear resulting in absconder charge-sheet against him. 5. Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, objected to the grant of bail at this stage and prayed for the calling of the scanned copy of the trial court record. 6. Perused the annexed documents in this regard. 7. It is submitted on behalf of the accused that he shall appear regularly and abide by any conditions imposed on him. 8. Since, the investigation of the case is over and most of the relevant certified copies have been annexed, therefore, I propose to dispose of this anticipatory bail petition. 9. Therefore, in such view of the matter, in the event of his Page No.# 3/3 arrest in connection with this case, the petitioner namely, Moyaj Uddin @ Mohammad Maijuddin @ Md. Maijuddin shall be allowed to go on bail of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the arresting authority with following conditions: (i) That the petitioner shall appear before the learned court below and cooperate with the trial. (ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who may be acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts of the case before the Investigating Officer; (iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 10. Consequently, NBWA issued against the petitioner vide order dated 05.07.2025 shall be treated as BWA. 11. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant