Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17165 (KAR)

SRI SANDESHA A S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7415/2020 · 2025-01-16

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1758 WP No. 7415 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 7415 OF 2020 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI. SANDESHA.A.S. S/O LATE SHIVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ADVOCATE IN PROFESSION, R/AT NO.1/1, PRASHANTH NILAYA, 9TH MAIN, J.C.NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANUSHANKAR.S.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NO.2, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. SRI.JAGADEESH.M AGED ABOUT MAJOR, CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, MUDIGERE POLICE STATION, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. PIN-577 132. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1758 WP No. 7415 of 2020 4. SRI.RAKESH.C AGED ABOUT MAJOR, POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, GONIBEEDU POLICE STATION, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. PIN-577 132. 5. SRI.A.G.SUBRAYA GOWDA S/O GOPAL GOWDA A.B., EX-TALUK PANCHAYATH PRESIDENT, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ANAJURU VILLAGE, JANNAPURA POST, GONIBEEDU HOBLI, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST-577 132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 & 2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Manushankar.S.S., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1758 WP No. 7415 of 2020 withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Manushankar.S.S., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2