•i APHC010232692002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ / MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPAT WRIT PETITION NO: 25054 OF 2002 Between: M.Raghava Kumar, S/o.M, Narayana. R/o Srisailqm, Kurnool District. Petitioner AND The Executive Officer S B M S Devasthanam Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Devasthanam. Srisailam district. Srisailam, Sri Kurnool ...Respondent praying that in the may be Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particulary one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the and appointing the petitioner as L.D,Typist or Junior Assistant vacancies in the respondent devasthanam respondent in not considering in the existing as illegal,improper, unjust and passed by this Hon'ble petitioner is eligible in any of the discriminatoy and contrary to the orders dt.4-2-199$ Court in W.P.NO.30010/1995 and further declare that the and entitled to be appointed as L.D.Typist orJunior Assistant i existing posts and pass. lA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 31598 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for appointment in the existing post of L.D. Typist/ Junior Assistant, pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 1850 OF 2003: Between: The Executive Officer, Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Devasthanam. Srisailam, Kurnool district. ... Petitioner/Respondent AND M.Raghava Kumar, $/o.M. Narayana. R/o Srisailam, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Petitioner Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP.No. 31598 of 2002 in WP.No. 25054/2002 dated 19-12-2002. Counsel for the Petitioner: RAGHAVAN K THALAPAKA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) The Court made the following order: APHC010232692002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] sS-S MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25054/2002 Between: S/O.M. NARAYANA. R/O SRISAILAM, 1.M.RAGHAVA KUMAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER S B M S DEVASTHANAM SRISAILAM, Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Devasthanam. Srisailam district. Kurnool ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction’ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering and appointing the petitioner as L.D, Typist or Junior Assistant in the existing vacancies in the respondent devasthanam, as illegal, improper, unjust and discriminatory and contrary to the orders dt.4-2-1998 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.NO.30010/1995 and further declare that the petitioner is eligible and entitled to be appointed as L.D.Typist or Junior Assistant in any of the existing posts and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2QQ2fWPMP 31598 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for appointment in the existing post of L.D. TypisV Junior Assistant disposal of the above writ petition and [A NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 1850 OF 200.? Petition under Section 151 CPC pending pass. ■ X. praying that in the circumstances stated m the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IO vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP.No. 31598 of 2002 25054/2002 dated 19-12-2002 and in WP.No. pass. JA NO: 2 OF 2003(WVMP 59997 OF 2nn.? in the^lffidr-m h' «^=^^stances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lA NO: 1 OF 2024 in the,?!'!!”" circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to PsnsV f noon' 31-10-2024 in W.P No 25054 of 2002 , in the interest of justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAGHAVAN K THALAPAKA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS 2. G RAMANA RAO RAYALASEEMAREGION) The Court made the following order: Sri M.S.P Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri K. Raghavan Thalapaka, learned counsel for thp petitioner, submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// My SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. Raghavan K Thalapaka, Advocate [OPUC] SRI. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies. 2. One CC to AL HIGH COURT DATED;07/07/2025 I 11 m 2i)?5 'I Current Section .y/ ORDER WP NO. 25054 OF 2002 COSTS^'^*^ 'NFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT