HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24396 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Sri Satanand Mishra holding brief of Sri A.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal and Sri Omkar Nath, learned counsel for the respondents are present. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that due to subsequent development, the matter has now become infructuous and prays for its dismissal. 3. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel for the respondent have no objection. 4. In view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 28, 2025 Sushma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.P. Singh, Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal, A.S.G.I., C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Yasheen Ansari .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad