DR. SYED MUDDASSIR AHAMED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/4487/2023 · 2025-03-10
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17163 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17163 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10806 WP No. 4487 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 4487 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
DR. SYED MUDDASSIR AHAMED S/O SYED ASAD ULLA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, NEAR SUFIYA MASJID, JAKIR HUSSAIN MOHALLA, SRINIVASAPURA, KOLARA-563 135. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIREESHA KODGI, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION ANAND RAO CIRCLE, NEAR CITY RAILWAY STATION, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 009.
3.
THE REGISTRAR KARNATAKA STATE DENTAL COUNCIL, 5TH MAIN ROAD,CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018.
4.
THE RETURNING OFFICER KARNATAKA STATE DENTAL COUNCIL, 5TH MAIN ROAD,CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1)
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10806 WP No. 4487 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 02.01.2023 ISSUED BY THE R4 IN NO.KRDP/PCH/01/2022.23 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND DIRECTING THE R4 TO REDO THE VOTER LIST AS PER THE ACT AND RULES BEFORE THE ISSUING FRESH NOTIFICATION FOR ELECTION TO THE KARNATAKA DENTAL COUNCIL.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
The case is called twice today. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This Court on 25.03.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:
“A week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution.” Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BK : List No.: 1 Sl No.: 205