Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17162 (KAR)

TECH STEEL PRODUCTS LIMITED v. SYED SALAHUDDIN AGA

CRL.A/380/2025 · 2025-02-17

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6869 CRL.A No. 380 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 380 OF 2025 BETWEEN: TECH STEEL PRODUCTS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED AND REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT, NO. 671, NAGAWARA THANISANDRA MAIN ROAD S.R.K NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 077 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MRS. MUBEENA …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.S. SHYAMSUNDAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. SIVARAMA KRISHNANAN M.S, ADVOCATE) AND: SYED SALAHUDDIN AGA S/O AGA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201 VISTA BERLIE APARTMENT BERLIE STREET, LANGFORD ROAD SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 025 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) CR.PC (FILED U/S 419(4) OF BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND QUASH THE FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED 07.01.2025 Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6869 CRL.A No. 380 of 2025 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.828 OF 2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-68) AND CONSEQUENTLY, RESTORE THE FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT DATED 03.06.2023 (ANNEXURE-B) PASSED IN C.C.NO.8421/2021 BY THE LEARNED XIV ADDL. SCJ AND ACMM, BENGLAURU CITY (SCCH- 10) THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to make an application for restoration of Criminal Revision petition. 2. Memo reads thus “The undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant herein humbly submits and seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the captioned matter with liberty to file an interlocutory application seeking restoration of the Criminal Revision Petition preferred by the Appellant herein before this Hon’ble Court assailing the Impugned - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6869 CRL.A No. 380 of 2025 Judgment herein without prejudice. Hence this memo.” 3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make an application to restore the Criminal Revision Petition. 4. Registry is directed to return all documents to learned counsel for the appellant. 5. In view of the disposal of the case, the pending IA’s if any, does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18