Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171607 (ALL)

NAEEM v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35194/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35194 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Tufail Hasan, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32678 of 2025 on the ground that the applicant could not explain his criminal antecedents. 4. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.589 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Shikohabad, District- Firozabad, during the pendency of trial. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of one criminal case shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The detail of criminal case has been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of seven cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.8.2025 In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Asif Hasan, Tufail Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naeem .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) liberty of bail. 6. On the other hand, learned A.G.A./State Law Officer opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Naeem, involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 29, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35194 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad