HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39755 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned order dated 25.04.2014 passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Sonbhadra as well as entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Misc. Case No. 416 of 2023 (State vs. Inarmol and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 49 of 2018, under Sections 306, 201 I.P.C., Police Station Anpara, District Sonbhadra, pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Sonbhadra. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants contended that the applicants have been made accused under Section 446 Cr.P.C., wherein they had stood as sureties for the bail granted to Jitendra Vishwakarma, who happens to be the accused in the matter in question. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants innocently prays for disposal of the application filed before the Court below which is at page no. 28 of the application. 5. A bare perusal of the application in question shows that the said application has been filed on 11.09.2024 before the court below and as stated by the learned counsel for the applicants, which is still pending. Therefore, learned court below should decide the said application pending since more than one year. 6. On the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the applicants, learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Inarmol And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) AGA does not made any vehement objection. 7. Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the rights of the persons to get their grievance redressed by the competent court, it would be expedient to direct the court below to decide the application pending before it within a period of three months from the date of the certified copy of this order is produced before it. 8. with these observations the instant application is disposed of. 9. It is made clear that till disposal of the said application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the instant matter. October 30, 2025 Manoj A482 No. 39755 of 2024 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad