Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17157 (KAR)

SRI. PURANDAR K v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4932/2024 · 2025-03-10

Krishna S Dixit, Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9933-DB WP No. 4932 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 4932 OF 2024 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI. PURANDAR K, S/O LATE KRISHNANAIK H, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS WORKING AS TAHSILDAR GRADE -1 KARWAR TALUK, UTTARA KANANDA DISTRICT. PERMANENT RESIDENT OF KRISHNALLI KRUPA NEAR MUNCIPAL LAYOUT, 8TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, SS PURAM, TUMKUR - 572 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHASKAR GOWDA N.M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9933-DB WP No. 4932 of 2024 HASSAN - 573 201. 3. MEGHANA G, W/O PUNIT R, AGED 30 YEARS, R/AT MALLIKARJUNA NAGARA, SAKALESHPUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.01.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE TRIBUNAL IN A.No- 4506/2023 A/W APPLICATION No-4627/2023 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) Learned counsel for the petitioner has moved a memo dated 10.03.2025, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9933-DB WP No. 4932 of 2024 2. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner herein submits that, the above petition preferred against the order dated 23.01.2023 has been infructuous as the petitioner has been given posting as Tahsildar, Chikkanayakanahalli Taluk. Wherefore, the petitioner herein pray that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition in interest of justice and equity." 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE RD