IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9688/2025 Decided on: 17.06.2025 Shiv Ram …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta and Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks benefit of decision rendered in Baldev Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2. for claiming following substantive relief:- “i. That the respondents may be ordered to grant benefit of the judgment render in Baldev’s case and he may be deemed to be retired at the ae of 60 years on 30.04.2016 with notional benefits thereto such as enhanced gratuity and pay fixation etc.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 2711/2017 decided on 22.02.2022 2 3. Case file shows that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances to the respondents/competent authority. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to prefer representation for redressal of his grievances within two weeks, which shall be decided by the respondents/competent authority in accordance with law, keeping in view the aforesaid decision as expeditiously as possible preferably within six weeks. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 17th June, 2025(rohit)