SMT. GUDDI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/34922/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171547 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34922 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Sri Praveen Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel.
2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty.
3. The petitioners claim that they are adults and have performed marriage and living together out of their own freewill as husband and wife. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed. It is submitted that their marriage took place according to Hindu Rites and Rituals on 9.9.2025.
4. However, on the other side, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has got instruction in this matter and submitted that there is no threat or danger to life to the petitioners for their marriage, as the family members of both the petitioners are having no objection with the marriage of the petitioner. They have have given a written submission to the Station Officer, P.S. Charthawal, Distt. Muzaffarnagar that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners and they have not lodged any F.I.R. / missing report at any police station against the petitioners. Both the petitioners are major and they are not creating any type of hindrance in their peaceful marital life.
5. Since the petitioners have no threat to their lives, I find no cogent reason to pass any order for protection of the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 ss Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar, Priya Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Smt. Guddi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad