Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17154 (PAT)

Ragho Yadav @ Radhe Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/16663/2016 · 2025-08-05

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16663 of 2016 ====================================================== Ragho Yadav @ Radhe Yadav S/o Late Shree Gope @ Mishri Gope resident of Village- Sakuchidih Barabag, P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Rajgir, District- Nalanda. 3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Madhyama Sinchai Pariyojana, Jamui, District- Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan-SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 05-08-2025 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, AC to SC-25. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “for issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs/ Rule/ Order or direction for quashing the order dated 7.06.2016 passed by respondent no.2 in Case No. 40/16-17 as contained in Annexure-4 whereby and whereunder the respondent no. 2 has rejected the raiyati claim under khata no. 3 plot no. 283, an area 1.5 decimals which was acquired by State Government on the ground of non production of documentary evidence by petitioner in respect of Patna High Court CWJC No.16663 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 possession without considering the rent receipts as well as Jamabandi running in his favour.” 3. Learned State counsel has taken this Court to the Annexure-4 to show that as the petitioner failed to produce document before the learned Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Rajgir, his claim was rejected. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that armed with all the document(s), he shall be approaching the concerned authority. 5. The State has no objection to it. 6. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U