Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17151 (KAR)

SMT. MANJULA DEVI J v. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/4457/2020 · 2025-01-31

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4665 WP No. 4457 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4457 OF 2020 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SMT. MANJULA DEVI.J W/O LOKESH.C, AGED 31 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX, NUEVA PREMIUM CAFE, NO.2, INSIDE LOKESH HOUSE, KASABA HOBLI, MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MALLAREDDY.B.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA-562 129. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANGARA-562 129. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4665 WP No. 4457 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Chandrashekar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Malla Reddy.B.V., for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner has closed the business. Hence, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Counsel therefore submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner about withdrawal of the Writ Petition is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4665 WP No. 4457 of 2020 The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9.1