Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15937 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Adarsh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.P.Singh, learned Standing Counsel.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is relying on a judgment passed by Lucknow Bench of this Court in Writ-A No.3660 of 2024, Rudrabhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, Neutral Citation No.- 2024:AHC:LKO36331, that petitioner is entitled for pension.
3. Even if it is considered that petitioner is entitled for pension however, since admittedly, aforesaid judgment was not placed before the concerned respondent, therefore, petitioner was at fault, therefore, relief sought cannot be granted.
4. The present writ petition is still disposed of in the interest of justice that concerned respondent will look into the matter afresh in light of above judgment and in case there is still any legal impediment, same shall be communicated to the petitioner. October 29, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Indra Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Rekha Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad