APHC010232662010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1149/2010 Between: 1. CHATLA SAI DURGA AND ANOTHER,, W/O. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. BACK SIDE OF N.S.M.PUBLIC SCHOOL, DARSIPET - II, OPP VETARNARY HOSPITAL, PATAMATA, 2. CHATLA HARSHA VARDHAN,, S/O. CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, (BEING MINOR , REP BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E., 1ST PETITIONER, R/O. BACK SIDE OF N.S.M.PUBLIC SCHOOL, DARSIPET - II, OPP VETARNARY HOSPITAL, PATAMATA, ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY PP AND ANOTHER, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD 2. CHATLA CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY THAMMINAIDU, S/O. GANESH REDDY CULTIAVATION, R/O. OMBARAVILLI VILLAGE, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case against the order dt.28.07.2009 in M.C.No. 122/2004 on the file of the Court of Family Court - cum - IV Addl. District and Sessions Court, Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 3009 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 8 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case against the order dt.28.07.2009 in M.C.NO. 122 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Family Court - cum - IV Addl. District and Sessions Court, Vijayawada Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1149 of 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the order of the trial Court granting maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month, as the petitioner is not satisfied with the quantum of maintenance awarded. 2. None appeared for the petitioners despite the conditional order passed by this Court dated 13.08.2025. 3. Since the petitioners are not showing interest, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 30.08.2025 M K K