Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1714 (CHH)

MITHLESH SAHU @ MIVAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER

CRMP/178/2024 · 2025-01-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1122 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 178 of 2024 Mithlesh Sahu @ Mivan S/o Rajendra Sahu Aged About 25 Years R/o 4th Floor, Chandra Square, Vidhan Sabha Road, Mowa, P.S.- Mowa, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through S.H.O. Police Station - Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. S. Nil. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praghalbha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Praghalbha Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/ respondent No.1. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.01.08 17:48:17 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with the following prayers :- “It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceeding arising out of FIR No. 830/2023 registered with the Police station of Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur against the petitioner charged under Ss. 376, 323 IPC & 3(2)(v)(a) of the (SC/ST) P.A. Act. (ANNEXURE-P/01) And further quash the entire proceeding Criminal Case No. SPL. CASE (ATROCITY)/35/2023 (State of Chhattisgarh Vs Mithlesh Sahu) U/s 376, 323 IPC & 3(2)(v)(a) of the (SC/ST) P.A. Act, pending before the Hon'ble Special Judge (SC/ST) P.A. Act, Bilaspur (C.G.) (ANNEXURE-P/02) And/or any other relief/ relief's which this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may please be also granted to the petitioners in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn as the trial is in the advance stage and the statement of the victim has already been recorded. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra