MADRASA MAKTAB ISLAMIYA ARBIYA TALIM UI QURAN SAKIN KANAU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/3423/2025 · 2025-12-10
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17139 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17139 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10961 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PMS/ 3 4 2 3 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought following relief:
“1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing/ setting aside the
order dated 17.03.2025 issued by respondent nos. 3, (Annexure No 3 of this writ petition)
2. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or directions to the Respondents to immediately de-seal the petitioner’s Madarsa/ Maktab and restore its operations and decide the representation in as soon as possible. (Annexure No 4 to this writ petition)
3. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from stopping Deeni Tamil of petitioner’s.
4. Issue an appropriate writ, order or directions declare the sealing of the Madarsa/ Maktab as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional.”
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that issue involved in this writ petition is decided in Writ Petition No. 835 of 2025 (MS), therefore, this petition be decided in terms of the said judgment.
5. Learned State Counsel fairly concedes that the issue decided in that writ petition covers the issue raised by petitioners in this petition,
2025:UHC:10961 therefore, he has no objection if this petition is decided in terms of the said
judgment.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is decided in terms of judgment dated 26.08.2025, rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 835 of 2025 (MS).
7. Petitioners shall give undertaking before the concerned Sub Divisional Magistrate that they will neither run Madarsa nor use the expression ‘Madarsa’ in the name of institution run by them till the time his institution is duly registered/ recognized by Uttarakhand Madarsa Education Board.
8. It is made clear that if petitioners fail to abide by the undertaking given by them or if they are found unauthorisedly using the expression ‘Madarsa’ in the name of institution run by them, the authorities shall be free to take necessary action against the petitioners.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 10.12.2025 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb904 6f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A1038 19DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB2 1CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.12.10 17:48:36 +05'30'