SMT.KURESHA BEGUM v. PARMESHWAR CHANDRA AND ANOTHER
SAPL/2505/1983 · 2025-10-29
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 171388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SECOND APPEAL No. - 2505 of 1983 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. On 19.09.2025, notice was issued to appellant to engage another counsel.
2. Office report dated 29.10.2025 indicates that notice sent to appellant has not returned back after service.
3. In view of said office report, notice upon appellant is deemed sufficient.
4. As no one has put in appearance on behalf of appellant, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 30, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : M.A.Qadeer Counsel for Respondent(s) : H.R.Mishra (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt.Kuresha Begum .....Appellant(s) Parmeshwar Chandra And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad