SEELAPUREDDY LAKSHMI NARASIMHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/15332/2020 · 2025-09-16
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010232452020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15332/2020 Between:
1. SEELAPUREDDY LAKSHMI NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O.
NAGI REDDY AGE 35 YEARS, R/O. VELAGALAPALLI H/O. PRAGADAVARAM GRAM PANCHAYAT CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI
2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR MGNREGS, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU
3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU
4. THE TAHSILDAR, , CHINTALAPUDI MAND CHINTALAPUDI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2
5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
7. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CUM SPECIAL OFFICER, PRAGADAVARAM GRAM PANCHAYAT CHINTALAPUDI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
8. THE PRAGADAVARAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, PRAGADAVARAM VILLAGE, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS SECRETARY
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 to 8 in resorting to shift Village Secretariat, Rytu Bharosa Kendram and YSR Clinic to Fathimapuram from Velagalapalli Village, H/o. Pragadavaram Gram Panchayat, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District by making construction of buildings in Fathimapuram in stead of Velagalapalli Village, H/o. Pragadavaram Gram Panchayat, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District contrary to the administrative sanction granted by the 2nd respondent vide Roc. D1/2460/2019 e-1778458 dated 24.01.2020 and the resolution dated 07.07.2020 passed by the 8th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, ultra-virus, against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the procedure established by law and consequentially direct the respondents to construct Village Secretariat, Rytu Bharosa and YSR Clinic buildings in Velagalapalli Village, H/o. Pragadavaram Gram Panchayat, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District in the interest of justice and pass
3
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
4
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.15332 of 2020
This Court made the following
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent – Gram Panchayat, learned Government Pleader for Revenue and perused the material placed on record. 2. The case of the petitioner herein is that the Respondents are trying to shift Village Secretariat, Rytu Bharosa Kendram and YSR Clinic to Fathimapuram from Velagalapalli Village, H/o Pragadavaram Gram Panchayat, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District contrary to the administrative sanction granted by the 2nd respondent vide ROC.D1/2460/2019, e-1778458, dated 24.01.2020 and the resolution dated 07.07.2020 passed by the 8th respondent. Hence the writ petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that pending writ petition, the Village Secretariat as well as Rythu Bharosa Kendram have already been constructed in another place in view of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.12509 of 2020. 5
4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat and learned counsel or unofficial respondents, in view of the constructions of the Village Secretariat and Rythu Bharosa Kendram had already been constructed in another place which was donated by the villagers, no orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition for further adjudication. 5. Observing the above, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
17.09.2025 krk
6
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.15332 of 2020
17.09.2025 krk
86