HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15744 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner has been enrolled in PRD service in the year 1994 bearing ID No. Q5801012, however, the writ petitioner despite work being available is not being allowed to perform duties. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that whatever might be the writ petitioner does not have legal indefeasible right to be accorded appointment, however, the same is subject to work exigencies. He submits that the claim of the writ petitioner shall be decided at the first instance by respondent no. 5, District Youth Welfare and Pradeshik Vikas Dal, District Ghaziabad. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the fifth respondent, District Youth Welfare and Pradeshik Vikas Dal, District Ghaziabad by 07.11.2025. Thereafter, the fifth respondent shall decide the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of three months bearing in mind from the date of production of certified copy of the order. October 28, 2025 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh, Hitesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Gyan Chandra Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad