SURESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SURESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5626/2025 · 2025-07-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17136 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17136 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18515]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5626 of 2025
Suresh Kumar Yadav @ Suresh Yadav, aged about 31 years, Son of Indradeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Bandu, P.O- and P.S-Lawalong, District-Chatra.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opp. parties
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Choubey , Adv. For the State
: Ms. Priya Shreshta, Spl. PP.
02 / 09.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bariyatu P. S. case no. 20 of 2025 instituted under Section 17 (b), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS, Act.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in transportation of opium in a motorcycle and from the possession of the petitioner, 593 gms. of opium, was recovered and 1.861 kg of opium was recovered from the co-accused person. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.03.2025 , as mentioned in para 17 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to
annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Latehar in connection with Bariyatu P. S. case no. 20 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-