HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2021 of 2017 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Mr. Jhamman Ram, learned AGA for the State. 2. It has been submitted by the counsel for the revisionist that the present complaint case has been rejected by the trial court and thus the present criminal revision has become infructuous, therefore, the revisionist does not want to press the present revision. 3. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State do not dispute the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the revisionist. 4. Accordingly, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. October 29, 2025 Abhishek Singh Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Dhirendra Nath Srivastava, P.K. Rao Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mukesh Kumar (Tarun Saxena,J.) Dr. William Nicholson John .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad