Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171332 (ALL)

JAMIRUN NISHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/26936/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 26936 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. The case is called out in revise. Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 is not present, whereas, Sri Shahid Ali Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioners is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners informed that Sri Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 was present in the first call, but in the revise call he is not present and is avoiding the Court. 3. Under such facts of the case, respondent No. 6 is directed to replace Sri Pradeep Singh, Advocate and appoint some other counsel for proper assistance of the Court. 4. Present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents not to demolish/ not to dispossess petitioners from Arazi/Gata No. 7Mi, Khata No. 113 of petitioner No. 1 and Khata No. 19 of Petitioner No. 2, situated at Village Manigarha, Tehsil-Lalganj, District-Mirzapur without following due process of law, till the fresh demarcation carried out by the competent Revenue Official or till suitable compensation is paid to petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners himself informed that now the respondent No. 5 has initiated the proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. He further prayed that interim protection may be granted not to demolish the house of the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shahid Ali Siddiqui, Shimpi Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Jamirun Nisha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Once, it is the case of petitioners that proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has already been initiated, there is not occasion for the Court to interfere with the same. However, it is directed that house of petitioners shall not be demolished without conclusion of proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 7. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed off. October 29, 2025 ADY WRIC No. 26936 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad