1 2025:CGHC:17540 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1790 of 2025 Sant Ram Chandrakar S/o Phirtu Ram Chandrakar Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 68, Kumhar Para, Raipura, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - The S.D.O. Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Motipur, Block- Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) --- Respondents WPC No. 1791 of 2025 Naresh Sharma S/o Lt. Harakh Ram Sharma Aged About 52 Years R/o Sector- 2, Road No. 03, Professor Colony, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.04.17 10:31:30 +0530 2 2 - The Collector District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - The S.D.O. Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Motipur, Block- Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) --- Respondents WPC No. 1793 of 2025 Ajit Thakur S/o Ashok Singh Thakur Aged About 44 Years R/o Naagorao State Parthvi Nagar, Tatibandh- Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District-Durg (C.G.) 3 - The S.D.O. Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Tahsildar Patan District- Durg (C.G.) 5 - The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Motipur, Block- Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For respective Petitioners : Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate For State/respondents : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 16.04.2025 1. Mr. Sachin Nidhi, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the writ petitions submits that he may be permitted to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to contest their cases before the concerned Tahsildar. 3 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents have no objection. 3. Accordingly, instant writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh