HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13102 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the court of Learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Basti to decide recall application accordance with law, which is pending in original suit no. 1118/2019 (Smt. Pushpa Verma Vs. Rangi Lal and others), within specific period fixed by this Hon'ble otherwise applicant/petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that recall application is pending since 16.12.2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Basti to consider and decide the aforementioned recall application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 30, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Pandey, Kali Charan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt. Pushpa Verma .....Petitioner(s) Rangi Lal And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad