Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 171302 (ALL)

BUDDH VILASH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

CRLP/17205/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17205 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with following main reliefs:- "i- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and directing the respondents police authorities to pass an appropriate order on the petitioner's application dated 11.07.2025 within stipulated period. ii- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and directing the respondent Police Authorities to do proper and fair investigation in proper sections/offence in relation to the Case Crime No.210 of 2025, under Sections 108, 351(2) BNS, Police Station - Girwa, District - Banda." 2. Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State- respondents has placed short counter affidavit before this Court, which is taken on record. 3. Learned A.G.A. submitted that in instant matter investigation has been completed and charge sheet has already been filed on 27.08.2025 against the accused persons. In support of his contention, he has referred paragraph no.6 of the short counter affidavit. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. and paragraph no.6 of the short counter affidavit, with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dev Kumar Yadav, Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Buddh Vilash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and averments made in short counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 7. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law. October 29, 2025 Atul CRLP No. 17205 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad