Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1713 (AP)

M/s Sudhakara Infratech Pvt.Ltd v. S. Suresh Kumar IAS

CC/4210/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J C.C.No.4210_2025 APHC010697362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4210/2025 Between: 1. M/S SUDHAKARA INFRATECH PVT.LTD, FLAT NO.304, METRO RESIDENCY, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER VAKKALAGADA SURESH KUMAR, S/O. SUBRAHMANYAM, R/O. 6-19, NAIDU STREET, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. AJAY JAIN, SPL. CHIEF SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 4. P ARUN BABU, MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, PLOT N0.11 AND 12, BEHIND BSNL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, AUTO NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 5. PERUGU PRASAD, PROJECT DIRECTOR, HOUSING, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): HN, J C.C.No.4210_2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.NO. 31522 of 2023, dated 10-09-2025 passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice HARINATH N and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DHARANI KUMAR B Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED) 4. HN, J C.C.No.4210_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.04.2026 NKA HN, J C.C.No.4210_2025 291 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4210 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026 NKA