Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-4427-2025 (O&M) 1 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 298 CRM-M-4427-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 VEDPAL AND ORS ....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Rajesh Duhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Gurtej Singh Dhindsa, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 6.
MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.192 dated 15.04.2023 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Sector 32-33, District Karnal and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 06.01.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 27.01.2025 and 19.03.2025 had
directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Karnal and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 19.04.2024 to the effect that the compromise has Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-4427-2025 (O&M) 2 been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to 6 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.192 dated 15.04.2023 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Sector 32-33, District Karnal and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 06.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners.
( MANISHA BATRA ) 25.04.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document