HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4095 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Opposite party has filed compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 2. Learned Standing Counsel representing the opposite party submits that claim of the present applicant has been considered and decided vide order dated 12.09.2025 in compliance of order dated 23.04.2025 passed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the order dated 12.09.2025, however, he has raised some objection with regard to the service book. 4. In my opinion, alternative remedy is available to the applicant to approach before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance, if any. 5. In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) October 29, 2025 Radhika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Pandey, Bipin Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dr. Keshav Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Ravindra Kumar, Director Pension, Directorate U.P. Ifmtr Campus .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad